Senseless Tragedy

This is a heavy heartfelt post.  If you want something light–stop reading.

Over the last few weeks, there has been media attention on the suicides of 5 gay teens.  My heart breaks for them in death and for those left to stare at empty rooms, where hopes and dreams will rot.  I have a brother who this could have been.  Why do some kids feel hopeless and other feel empowered.  I don’t  know the story of the lives of these young boys who saw only darkness a head of them.  I do know my brothers story.  I also know that my brother, in high school, lost friends in these same senseless ways.  I imagine what helped my brother the most was his inner circle.  He had a great group of friends who didn’t judge.  Having a group/place is so important as students are developing their identity.  At this stage of development teens are pulling away from their families (which is why what other kids say is more influential in their choices than what their parents say) and towards age group relationships.  Family acceptance and support is certainly important, but not nearly as important or as devastating as rejection from their peer groups.

Bullying is an epidemic in our society.  We only have to look to the way the adults in our society act (especially within our political rhetoric) to see where teens come to this us and them mentality.  Our media and opposing views are constantly belittling the other side, talking about how wrong they are, etc.  The issues of homosexuality is at the forefront of this barrage as the right vehemently opposed gay marriage, etc.  The propaganda that is presented in the media in soundbites is what we see going on in our schools.  The mud that is flung from side to side has trickled its way down into our schools (we see the same thing with sex in our society).  The media has power and influence.  It also has a responsibility.  If our adults are going to be attacking those who are different then how can we not expect our kids to do the same?

There is so much I could say and my heart is heavy with sadness.  There are always going to be bullies–at every age.  I am not excusing bullying, but there is a deeper root to these acts of suicide than just bullying.  The difference I see is that these kids didn’t kill themselves because they were bullied, but because they were not accepted by their peers.  Who could they turn to as their friends or confidants about that bullying?  Who accepted them?  Who were their friends who cared about them?  If they felt like they didn’t have those, they feel like they don’t have a reason to live.

We need more support groups in our schools for those who are different.  Every school should have a GLBT alliance chapter in their schools so that these kids have a place to turn for support.  If your child comes out–get them into therapy–not to fix them (they aren’t broken)–but so they have someone to talk to about what happens at school.  Make sure you are aware of what goes on.  Help them foster friendships and encourage it.  Kids need friends and to feel as though they belong.  During the teen years, they need to belong with other their age.  Consider changing schools if your son/daughter is struggling to make friends and belong.

There are no easy answers. Our society if filled with hate and separation.  Kids need to be taught about being different and our media personalities who get so much time in the press need to start acting with common decency. We can have differences without having to attack on another.  It’s time was all accept each other and start the conversation about common human decency.

That Damn Media

I have posted about this whole “octo-mom” thing.  I admit I was judgemental.  I’ll say it.  I was and we all have been.  There is a great momversation about it and the whole judging mothers thing that all of us like to do.  It’s natural but really isn’t all that productive.  Rebecca really made me think about it from a different perspective and I appreciate that. 

I blame the media for so much of what is happening.  Again, these are all real people involved and we don’t know what the outcome of this is going to be for those innocent children.  It is awful that they have to have their young life invaded by media speculation and world-wide judgement of their mother.  That just sucks. 

Hubby and I had decided that we were going to do IVF this fall.  All of this media circus surrounding Ms. Suleman and her babies has caused my husband great pause about undergoing IVF.  Part of him thinks we should be happy and feel blessed with the children we have.  I agree to some point.  I know our situation is different as we are infertile and Ms. Suleman was/is not–she is just single and that is something very different.  Our cases are not parallel in any way.  But we have to wonder if there will be a backlash against those of us who do conceive through IVF.  Will it all of a sudden be something we don’t talk about anymore?  That would suck. 

We talked about it and have decided to pursue it–because we want more children and we would like to exhaust all avenues attempting to create a biological child.  We also plan to adopt if we cannot conceive a biological child.  We know what we want and I know it isn’t 8 kids at once (or at all for that matter).  And, I’ll continue to talk about our avenues for creating the family we want.

Oh Media, Really. Who Is To Blame?

Now that I am part of the real world again, I have to take issue with this whole Miley Cyrus photo issue.  Is the photo sexual?  Okay, I have to say yeah it is.  It is a grown-up photo–for a grown-up magazine.  The photo wasn’t taken for People or CosmoGirl or Glamour it was taken for Vanity Fair.  It wasn’t a cover photo and Vanity Fair didn’t release the photo online for publicity.  The mass media got a hold of the pictures and made them an issue.  Most tween and teen girls, for whom Hannah Montana is a role model, do not read Vanity Fair and therefore, would most likely not be influenced to have sex and show their bodies if Miley hadn’t.  But wait, they do that already. 

The bigger issue is that of the media creating news where there really is none to increase add revenue, exposure, etc.  I have to defend Annie Leibovitz.  The picture is a beautiful classic portrait and no one would have had an issue if the photo wasn’t published in a major magazine.  She is a teen girl playing dress-up (or dress down in this instance).  She is a young girl, but no one is making an issue with how much she works–or how exploited she is by Disney at her young age, but she takes a photo that she wants to and she is being taken advantage of.  We don’t worry that Disney or even her family is taking advantage of her talent for the $$$$$$$$$$$$$, but Vanity Fair and Leibovitz are taking advantage of her youth and innocence with this photo.  It irritates me to no end that we think its okay to use someone to make you a buck as long as someone else’s use of them doesn’t infringe on our own ability to cash in. 

Miley is a person–a real person.  Hannah Montana is a fictional character and the two should be seen and treated as separate individuals.  Hannah Montana as a fictional character should not been anyone’s role model.  Those should be found closer to home.  Maybe that is what we need to start looking at. 

Is It Really A Woman’s Right…

to be on the LA SWAT team?  Okay feminist readers, hold on.  I know that is a loaded question.  Let me explain before you rip my bra off and burn it (I am smiling while typing that..).  The LA SWAT team has never had a woman officer.  The elite 43 man force has always been just that men.  Not because they don’t let women apply, but because no women who have applied have been able to pass the physical requirement.  What trips them up?  The Marine obstacle course. 

Because of this–the new director of LA SWAT is trying to get the physical requirement waived for women.  Yes just for women.  The wives of the SWAT officers are up in arms–as are probably the officers and all men who fail the course as well.  The wives say it is a risk that should not be taken with anyone’s life.  The media of course pitched this story to make it sound like the wives didn’t want there to be any women SWAT officers.  That, surprisingly, isn’t so. The wives don’t want the requirements to be changed.  I happen to agree with them.  There are certain jobs that require a certain amount of physical strength and ability.  This is one of them. 

I take issue with the media for skewing the real issues of this story.  It is about something beyond adding a woman to the SWAT team.  I was thinking about this issue.  The Marine obstacle course is what the women can’t seem to conquer.  Is it really unfair?  Biased towards men?  Maybe–but last time I checked there were female Marines.  So, it must not be impossible.  FBI officers have to pass the course too (at least they use to but I am pretty sure they have to now as well)–and there are female FBI agents.  The problem is that women who are physically capable–aren’t applying.  Eventually one will, but don’t compromise the lives of others because you want a woman to be on SWAT. 

I am sure women police officers who want to be SWAT are the ones calling for change–the news didn’t cover that part of the story–just the part about the wives not wanting women on SWAT.  I don’t see any media bias there, do you?  Is it really our right to have any job we want?  If so, I want to be a taste tester for Ben & Jerry.  We think and are constantly told we can do anything we want.  We can’t be discriminated against, etc.  But you can only do anything you want if you can actually do it.  I can only be a fire fighter if I can do the actual job.  Not just because I want to be one. 

I can only be a doctor if I can do the job, not just because I want to.  I get really frustrated by folks screaming foul–not because they have really been mistreated, but because they cannot do what they want–not because someone won’t let them, but because they really can’t do it.  I wanted to be a veterinarian but suck at math and chemistry.  I had to accept that I didn’t have the ability.  I could have probably worked really hard and made it through, but I didn’t want it bad enough.  I am sad that we somehow as a people feel entitled to anything we want.  We think we deserve to have a job–that it is our right to have the job we want.  It is our right to be able to apply for any job we want that we are qualified for.  If we aren’t qualified–we have to accept that.  So, SWAT wannabes–become qualified. 

Reason 4,345,235,235,123 For Why I Dislike The Media

Where to start…Okay let’s just jump right in with Spitzer.  I mean really who doesn’t love a little ‘paid for sex’ sleaze?  I totally understand why he is a story.  He really is the epitome of hypocrisy in regards to this type of conduct.  Yes, he is still human, but the hypocrisy is important to expose so that we as Americans remind ourselves that those so often in power are in it for themselves.  My issue with this whole scandal is the negative focus on his wife and the labelling of the prostitute as the “woman who brought down a governor.”  I will not get into a petty debate about who went down on whom.  At $1000 bucks an hour–my money is on her being the one to go down…

But I digress.  Once the scandal broke the CBS Early Show had on two WOMEN to analyze and discuss why MEN CHEAT.  And more specifically, why powerful men cheat.  I have a problem when women who aren’t experts in male behavior–neither was a psychiatrist or a sex therapist.  Their reason was of course that men cheat and more importantly powerful men cheat because they can and because it makes them feel more powerful.  I think this is a crassly simplistic view at why people cheat.  There are many complex issues as to why men and women cheat–both powerful and run of the mill.  But that is a topic for another day.  My main problem with this CBS piece was that one of the women–a staunch radical, bra-burning feminist–railed on Spitzer’s wife for standing next to him when he was giving his press conference.  She was enraged that this woman would stand by her man [she must not be strong enough to stand up for her self she implied].  She said that by standing by her man she was sending a message to all women that it is okay what her husband did.  I too think that is a gross simplification of the situation. 

One of the things I have very recently learned and come to understand is that you can accept what people have done, feel, believe, without condoning it.  You can respect a person, institution, vows, without condoning the behavior.  Mrs. Spitzer vowed to be married for better or worse.  By standing next to her man she was not saying it was okay what he did, but she was respecting the institution of marriage.  I was impressed to see that marriage still means something.  I am sure she is angry, pained, hurt, humiliated, and a long list of other adjectives, but that is private and who are we to judge her for her choice to respect her vow.  She has more than herself to think about–her children, her own feelings about the sanctity of marriage.  We should not throw stones.  Lets focus on the real issue…Oh yeah, paying for sex is really not that scandalous it has been happening for as long as there have been money/goods to trade. 

Now onto the “woman who brought down a governor.”  Shame on you media.  She didn’t come forward and rat him out.  Stop playing it up like it is her fault.  She was just a girl doing her job.  The guy got caught–by the IRS or some other financial group looking at money going out and seeing suspicious activity.  Then when he came forward and admitted what he did, the hounds were released and they didn’t stop until they tracked this woman down.  Why the hell do we care?  Sure taking money for sex is “illegal” but come one.  Leave her alone.  It is not her fault.  I don’t think high-class escorts cold call like those annoying Edward Jones folks who canvas neighborhoods looking for business.  I am pretty sure he sought her out.  Just a guess, but I think that just might be the way it happened.  So, if that is the case…how is it her fault?  Isn’t it the fault of Spitzer who chose to spend huge amounts of money for sex?  I might be going out on a limb here, but shouldn’t we be looking at him as the person at fault and not this chick just trying to make a living? 

These are just a few of the reasons.  I could go on, as I got really pissy at GMA this morning when Chris was interviewing an Obama staffer about Obama’s retired minster’s political views.  Isn’t there still a war going on in the middle east?  Isn’t there still a terrible genocide happening in Darfur?  Aren’t people in New Orleans still struggling to rebuild?  Isn’t our countries dependency on oil crippling our economy? 

 I guess it is still sex that sells and like Kennedy learned in the 60’s if you aren’t a protestant or an evangelical christian your relgious and political values are challenged at every turn.  I happen to think Obama’s “radical” minister speaks a lot of truths that those fat, rich white fellas don’t want to admit.  What do you think?