Internalized Racism Is

something I will have to be aware of to effectively parent my Ethiopian children as a white mother/woman.  Internalized racism is the taking on of the values and perspectives of the dominant culture–including things that are detrimental to a person’s own image or sense of self.  For those of us raising girls–watch this…

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAOZhuRb_Q8%5D

click here to watch it on youtube.

White Privilege Oblivion–Part 1

This post will be long….Be forewarned.

I think I am ready to get some thoughts down about the documentary The Color of Fear (1994).  It was a powerful movie that has forced me to look into myself and to admit that there are many things about race that I still don’t and will not be able to understand about race/racism/prejudice. 

Let me define first racism and prejudice.  The predominant social science definition of racism is that it is based in power–meaning that in our country (most of the western world) only white people can be racist as we are the ones who (as a group) hold the power in our society.  This means that there is no reverse racism–minorities by definition cannot be racist towards anyone as they do not have the power in our society–minorities can be prejudiced toward others but not racist.  I know there will be some of you that do not agree with that definition–but I do.  So it is where I operate from when I talk about racism. 

Here is the plot summary of the movie: Eight North American men, two African American, two Latinos, two Asian American and two Caucasian were gathered by director Lee Mun Wah, for a dialog about the state of race relations in America as seen through their eyes. The exchanges are sometimes dramatic, and put in plain light the pain caused by racism in North America.

I use to be of the mind that there is only one “race” and that we should really stop using the word race to define others.  I stand corrected.  There is only one “race” for me because I am white, “Whites don’t talk about themselves as white people but as human beings as if they are the same thing [white=human being]” (victor/TCoF).  I am humbled by this.  I thought I was so enlightened in my thinking.  I have often thought–naively I have now been reminded–that we are all human beings and why can’t we just all treat each other that way. 

The movie did a great job of bringing to light the often hidden white privilege.  The movie also talked about what it means to be considered American and how people of color view the word American and human being.  All of the men of color felt that to define yourself as just as an American was to lose something.  “When we [people of color] give up who we are to become Americans, we know that we are dying from it.  You’re dying from it to, but you don’t know it necessarily.  Get ethnic…” (victor).  This was a powerful moment in the film for me.  It really forced me to think about what being American is.  I consider myself lucky that I think about my ethnic heritage–Irish and German.  But it certainly isn’t part of my consciousness.  I describe myself as an American.  I never thought that the concept of being American meant something different to others. 

One of the Latino male participants brought up the presumptuousness of the term American–as everyone from North, Central and South American are technically Americans, yet we whites have taken the term America for ourselves and changed it for everyone else.  We made the term American synonymous with WHITE–making the term only apply to a small number of people who inhabit the Americas. 

I am so happy that I saw this movie.  As a white mother of a Ethiopian American, I understand the import of keeping his heritage prevalent in his consciousness.  To stop referring to him as an Ethiopian American means to deny him his sense of self.  He will always be seen as a black American or African American but the dominant culture and to deny that I am turning a blind eye(More on race labels in part 2).  I cannot afford to do that as his mother.  I have to teach him to love himself and to embrace himself not to teach him that assimilation is what he has to do.  As his parent I have to validate his experience.  I have to listen. 

We all have to listen and to validate the experiences of those different than us.  We cannot turn a blind eye because it hasn’t happened to us.  We cannot deny others the right to their heritage because it makes us uncomfortable.  Racism is essentially a white man’s issue/problem.  To say to those of color–why can’t we all just be human beings–is really saying “why can’t we all pretend to just be white?” 

As a white person living in a white community, I do not often have to deal with people of color outside of social situations (not in power relations).  But people of color always have to deal with white people in that power capacity and that influences the behavior.  To fit into corporate America ones has to effectively assimilate to white…I mean corporate culture.  To be an American is not what those of color aspire because the images of what an American is does not resemble them in anyway—doesn’t look, cry, play, etc., like them. 

To expect them to be “American” to participate in corporate culture is to strip them of their identity; thereby, making them vulnerable and stripped of all power.  As a white person, this is something that I will never have to do.  My son, as an Ethiopian American will be expected to do it.  Sadly, it will be easier for him because he will be raised in that community–but it will cause him to not fit into either community. 

We must listen.  We must validate.  We must accept.  We must support each other as we are, not as we think they should be. 

Such A Dark and Racist History The US Has

I consider myself and educated person.  I have read extensively and my liberal arts education exposed me to many things that I certainly didn’t learn in high school.  Sadly, there is so much more that I didn’t know.  I am taking the first class toward my doctorate this semester and it is a really great educational foundations course.  The course examines society and social justice not only in education, but throughout history.  I am currently reading and amazing book about our countries deeply rooted racist history–Deculturalization and the Struggle For Equality.  The book begins with an overview of the atrocities that our forefathers founded this country on.  We are all taught that Columbus discovered America–sadly we are not commonly taught that he discovered America only to find out that there were already people living here who had lived here successfully for thousands of years.  These “savages” were seen as less than human as they had not accepted Jesus and Christianity into their lives.  Our heavily religious Puritan founders believed that they were better than the Native Americans and set forth to convert them to Christianity and to their own protestant beliefs in hard work (i.e. constant work) and the accumulation of wealth–personal wealth certainly not wealth of the community/tribe.  These values were in direct opposition with that of the native Americans who believed in sharing everything with each other and with working when they needed to but relaxing when they could.  

Fast forward to the writing of the constitution, after which we successfully rid “our” land of these “savages” who were less than human.  Our founding fathers–these gentlemen we revere as “GREAT” men believed “that citizenship should be limited to free whites.  This agreement was based on the opinion that a republican form of government could only survive with a homogeneous white population.”  Native Americans were not granted American citizenship until 1924–yes the recent 1924–and even then there were second class citizens.  They are still treated that way. 

I could go on and on about the repression of the non-whites who helped build this country but we know much of that.  We took the land from the native americans under the belief that if they weren’t using it or making improvements to the land then the white man had every right to take it for their own use. 

All of this racism happened sadly in the name of God and Jesus.  The native american had a different believe system than our Anglo founders.  Because of that they were wrong and we had every right to take what they had and to control and convert them.  The same thing then happened with Africans, Chinese and Central Americans.  What happened to the Native americans was a genocide perpetrated under the name of Jesus.  How are our founders different than those who wage war now in the name of God?  We are civilized.  We are white. 

I often wonder why we cannot learn to tolerate and accept each other differences and all?  Well the history is there and it goes beyond the racism in America but speaks more to the racism around the world–both ethnic and religious.  As long as one group feels that they are superior to another group we will not know harmony.  As long as we try to assimilate people into the world we accept–not just expecting these groups to learn our language–but expecting them to take our values as their own we will continue to struggle with racism. 

This is what makes Obama a man for change.  I see the importance of his campaign and his success now.  I could keep writing on this topic but I will hold off for now as I can’t imagine anyone is still reading at this point.  If you are, still reading that is, how do we combat hundreds of years of racism? 

Gun’s R Us or Day 28

I am so not inspired to post today at all, but I will since I only have 2 more days after today before I can take a blog break and I don’t know watch some completely mind-numbing tv.  I would like that. 

I was watching the ABC evening news yesterday–at least I think it was yesterday.  All the days blur together during this time of the school year.  Okay, back on track here.  There was a story about semi-automatic assault rifles and the need for police departments to start having their officers carry them as there has been a huge rise in the use of semi-automatic assault rifles among the criminal element in our society.  In 1994 Pres Clinton passed a bill that banned the sale of these weapons (Ak-47, etc) and really who needs an assault rifle?  I would hate to see the deer that met a hunter who had one–there certainly wouldn’t be any meat to eat.  Quietly in 2004, congress and good ole’ Pres Bush let the ban pass.  There was an increase in assault rifle crimes.  Congress then made it ILLEGAL.  YES.  ILLEGAL to track assault rifle crimes.   All gun crimes were required to be tracked together.  Wonder whose pockets got lined in that deal and by whom?

I really am tired of all this NRA “they’re gonna talk all our guns” propaganda.  I am not a fan of guns, but hey you want to kill some deer or quail or duck, then you should be able too.  I don’t think that we should rid the world of all guns (wouldn’t the world be a safer place though).  I seriously don’t think anyone needs to have a handgun or an assault rifle.  It just seems absurd–you can protect your home with a two shot deer rifle or bird gun–don’t tell me you cannot and that it would take too long to load as you aren’t suppose to make it easy to load you gun because, well that is how little kids shoot each other.  Don’t we want our police officers safe–if we only made available 2 shot hunting rifles and 6 shot revolvers than what are the odds that some drugged up criminal is going to be able to hit me?  But if we sell them semi-automatic handguns and/or rifles with the capability of firing 20+ shots in a matter of minutes or in some cases seconds the odds increase greatly in favor of someone landing a shot. 

It is impossible in our world to stop the sale of something that is available.   Wouldn’t it be a clearer message if we banned the manufacture of such weapons.  If the criminals didn’t have them then the cops wouldn’t need them.  I know this is a simplistic view, but I am in a simplistic mood.  If we don’t want people shooting each other stop making guns that make it so frickin’ easy. 

Thankful Post Five or Day 23

I am thankful for my health and that of my families.  I am thankful that I have access to healthcare and that my healtcare company as paid for what we have needed–with gaining preapproval of course.  I am thankful that my belly is full and that I don’t know what it is like to go to bed hungry and not know where my next meal is coming from. 

I am in the middle of watching Michael Moore’s Sicko.  I think I want to live in France. Anyway…wanted to post before I forgot.  Will comeback later tonight (but probably tomorrow) to edit and add more to this post. 

Wishing you all health and happiness…

Okay I am back…I have read a few otherposts today about Michael Moore’s movie and the health crisis in America.  The whole health-care crisis saddens me.  I feel very strongly that people who need services should receive them.  Who are these corporate money-hungry bastards to tell us what we can get medically and not–when their bonuses are tied to how much money they save the company (i.e.–how many people they deny service/claims).  Do we really believe that they are making the best choices if they have to choose between saying yes to a multi-thousand dollar claim and getting a multi-thousand dollar bonus?  If you do…I am sorry for you and I am sorry for our system that keeps rewarding these gatekeepers. 

I also admit that Michael Moore only presented one side of many of the stories…as I am sure was his MO and also the fact that I am sure he couldn’t get cooperation from the other side on many occasions.  There is more to all of this than what we see on the surface.  But he did make a few great points in this move.  Our government isn’t afraid of us.  They are not at all worried about what we think nor do they really even care what we think.  They care what the lobbyists think.  The government is run by the lobbyists and not by the people it was meant to serve.  This is a problem as the health-care industry has 4 times as many lobbyists as we have members of congress.  That is a pretty big ratio and you can bet that each member of congress is being wined and dined by those 4 lobbyists. 

We are also a country that does not care about its citizens.  Not just the government but its other citizens.  Those who have think they should keep and those who don’t have–well often enough they just give up.  Most other western industrialized nations believe that those who have have a social responsibility to help out those who don’t.  Not handing out money–but paying more in taxes, etc.  We are the only western industrialized country that does not offer universal health-care.  Why do we ignore each other?  Why do we think that some of us are more deserving than others?  I am not talking about a redistribution of wealth but just a health-care system where everyone can go to the doctor and get the care that they need (not elective surgery–the government doesn’t need to pay for boob jobs, tummy tucks, and face lifts). 

How has the nation that was founded for the people gotten so far away from what the people need and deserve? 

It has been said that the love of money is the root of all evil. The want of money is so quite as truly.–Samuel Butler

Isn’t it time that we loved each other?